Agent Communication for Dynamic Belief Update
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Generalized Update: Belief Change in Dynamic Settings
Behef revision and belief update have been proposed as two types of behef change serving differ ent purposes Belief revision is intended to capture changes of an agent's belief state reflecting new information about a static world Belief update is intended to capture changes of behef in response to a changing world We argue that both belief revision and behef update are too restrictive, routine...
متن کاملAgent Interaction via Message-Based Belief Communication
This work reflects continued research into “temporally autonomous” multi-agent interaction. Many traditional approaches to modeling multi-agent systems involve synchronizing all agent activity in simulated environments to a single “universal’’ clock. In other words, agent behavior is regulated by a global timer where all agents act and interact deterministically in time. However, if the objecti...
متن کاملA Framework for Belief Update
Belief update and reasoning about actions are two well studied areas of research about the evolution of knowledge over time. The similarities between these two fields have already been pointed out by some researchers: for example del Val and Shoham [4] use a theory of action to derive a semantics for belief update; Li and Pereira [8] use a Ginsberg-like semantics for updating a theory of action...
متن کاملModeling Belief in Dynamic Systems, Part II: Revision and Update
The study of belief change has been an active area in philosophy and AI. In recent years two special cases of belief change, belief revision and belief update, have been studied in detail. In a companion paper (Friedman & Halpern, 1997), we introduce a new framework to model belief change. This framework combines temporal and epistemic modalities with a notion of plausibility, allowing us to ex...
متن کاملModeling Belief in Dynamic Systems, Part II: Revisions and Update
The study of belief change has been an active area in philosophy and AI. In recent years two special cases of belief change, belief revision and belief update, have been studied in detail. In a companion paper (Friedman & Halpern, 1997), we introduce a new framework to model belief change. This framework combines temporal and epistemic modalities with a notion of plausibility, allowing us to ex...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence
سال: 2009
ISSN: 1346-0714,1346-8030
DOI: 10.1527/tjsai.24.314